Technology Debate

We had again a debate, but this time the motion was "Ebooks v/s Pbooks", being Ebooks internet or similar files and Pbooks the physical, paper books. My group, Messrs. Núñez and Gré had to defend Ebooks, against Messrs. Reynolds, Oporto and Kitzing. Our arguments where focused in the comfortability and portability of the Ebook Readers, because in just one device, you can have hundreds of books or more. The part of the rebuttle was quite fun, in which Mr. Reynolds and I discussed mainly, with some hilarious interventions of Mr. Gré. 

Jargon v/s Slang

Do you know what does it mean "jargon"? According to The Cambridge Dictionary, this word stands for “special words and phrases which are used by particular groups of people, especially in their work.”. This is commonly used by some professions, like policemen or doctors. It's not the same than "slang" as you can read under.

                           Jargon

        Pros                           Cons

• Formality                 Common people wouldn't understand
• Wide Vocabulary    Needs knowledge to use

                           Slang

       Pros                            Cons

• Easy to use                 Informality
• Shorter language       Narrow Vocabulary

Personally, I think slang is always used and I do to, but the big problem about it is the informality. When you are in a formal occasion, you have to beware about what you say, because in any minute you may speak with a slang and it would be frowned up. And the problem with jargon is that not everyone knows it, so you can't talk always with jargon, because nobody would understand you.

Glossary of some Jargons:

http://crime.about.com/od/glpolice/Glossary_of_Police_Terms_Acronyms_and_Jargon.htm
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~kemmer/Words04/usage/jargon_medical.html

Practical Reading

If you want to test yourself if you've understood completely the text, you should ask yourself the following questions: 

To practise this, I will answer the questions based in a fragment of "The Catcher in the Rye", written by Jerome David Salinger.

• What is being shown or said in the text? Why is the text interesting?
• What do you think and feel about the text?
• What particular elements in the text have led you to your      conclusions?

"Boy, when you're dead, they really fix you up. I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead?"

The text tolds us about the process of death duel of the family. Probably they'll go every Sunday and put flowers in the "stomach" of the dead person, but for Holden Caulfield (protagonist), this is useless. Why'd you want to have flowers in your chest? Personally, I think he is trying to convince himself about this, because he had a brother that died young and he feels bad about it. So he may want to put this ideas in his head so he can try to separate a little bit from thinking in his brother and not feeling bad for not going to the cemetery. 

I have passed through this same situation, and I don't like going to the cemetery, but I think that the flowers are not specifically for the person that is dead, but they are for the person that goes to visit the place, so he feels better. 

Holden is characterized because of his careless way of thinking, so I don't believe his attitude should be discussed.

Are you just watching or making an active reading?

Active reading consists in getting all the content of the text, understanding "through the lines". To do this, I'll give some key techniques to start making an active reading and stop losing time.

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• Record yourself reading the text
• Underline the text
• Make annotations at margins
• Ask yourself questions (think critically)
• Sticky notes
• Close the book and ask yourself what is it about
• Look for important words
• Explain what you've read to someone else

Criticizing Literature

I made a short analysis about a fragment of "The Big Sleep", by Raymond Chandler. So hope you enjoy it!

                 Fragment of "The Big Sleep" Personal Analysis

Criticizing Images

As you have become a critical thinker, I'd like to remind you that not only texts can be analyzed, but also pictures. In today's class, we have to ask ourselves some few questions about an image, but the questions tried to make us go further, deep into the photograph. For me, it meant that we are all, no matter your colorcast, humans and that we should respect all the others. It's something very important to be open minded and think like that, because you'll not always find people that think as you do, so you have to accept their opinions and, in some cases, even you may change your way of thinking because of the others' arguments. Nowadays, racism is one of the worst evils that affect the World, so we have to erase it. How do we do it? It's "easy". We just need to educate correctly children, because they'll be the ones that live in the future and dictate how the things will be done.

Critical thinking

If you want to check if something is really a fact, you should ask questions to the person that is declaring it about: clarity,  accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, breadth and logic of the argument, and if he doesn't know how to answer something, or you notice that he's just inventing again, you can know that it isn't something in what you can trust. If you have done this questions, congratulations! You are now a critical thinker!

Why do we need to be critical thinkers? If you have ever thought about this question, it means that you have, at least a little part in you that thinks critically! Nowadays it's something very important to criticize the things that are told to us, even if they are given as "facts". Many people talks as if they were experts, but they just invent information an tell it as if it was reliable.
Personally, I think that some adults consider that when children critize them, they are just being rude and that they should only agree what they hear. I couldn't be more against this position, because every single person has the rights to express his own ideas. 

Real meaning?

For a better understanding of literature, I'll analyze the next poem with some few questions.

You fit into me

You fit into me

like a hook into an eye

A fish hook

An open eye

1        1.What is the relationship between the title and the rest of the poem?

As usual, the title is also the theme of the poem.

2      2.What words, if any, need to be defined (for example, are you familiar with a hook-and-eye clasping system in clothing)?

Hook-and-eye: A clothes fastener consisting of a small blunt metal hook that is inserted in a corresponding loop or eyelet. (www.thefreedictionary.com).

3        3.What relationships do you see among any words in the poem?

They are put in a way that, when you start reading you expect to find some type of love poem, but finally, you find that it wasn't that the purpose of the text.

4     4.What are the various connotative meanings of the words in the poem? Do these various shades of meaning help establish relationships or patterns in the text?

When you first read "You fit into me, like a hook into an eye", you think that one person was made for being with the other one, but when you read the other two lines "A fish hook, An open eye", you realize that it meant something painful, unforgettable.

5        5.What symbols, images or figures of speech are used? What is the relationship between them?

The entire poem is ambiguous. They all want to, at first, let us think it's something romantic, but then, we realize that is meant something horrorful.

6       6.What elements of rhyme, meter or pattern can you discuss?

It has got no rhyme, except for the repetition in lines two and four of the word "eye". In all the rest of it, it has no pattern.

7       7.What is the tone of the poem?

At first sight, love. After understanding the real meaning, madness or anger.

8       8. From what point of view is the content of the poem being told?

From a person that was hurt by his/her date.

9       9.What tensions, ambiguities or paradoxes arise within the poem?

An ambiguity could be find in the "hook into an eye" expression. Hook and eye, can mean a clothing fastener, or literally a hook inserted into an eye.

1     10.What do you believe the chief paradox or irony is in the text?

The "hook into an eye" expression, that in one part, means love, but also hate.

1     11. How do all of the elements of the poem support and develop the primary paradox or irony?

The element that support more the development of the paradox, is the ambiguity that expresses "hook into an eye". All of the present elements in the text, demonstrate the persona's feelings, and as it happens, his/her feelings are not clear and have a combination of love and hate to that person.

I think the real meaning of this poem was not the expected one, as it was hate and not love. In my case, I have realized through the reading of this poem, that not always our feelings are clear. Sometimes you like something, but also dislike it. This is how literature should be, expressive and ambiguous.

History of Studies of Literature

We have already defined what is literature, but now the question is, 
how do literature has been studied? For answering this, continue the reading below.


Greeks: In the V Century, the first who investigated about this topic where the people of the Peloponnese region. For them, the key concepts about literature where the Ontology (study of existence) and Epistemology (study of limits of knowledge)

Romanticism: In the Early XIX Century, in Europe they thought about this topic as something strongly relationed with feelings, expressions. So the best way to fulfill this anxiety was through poetry with common language, so everyone could understand it.

Scientific Determinism: In the Mid XIX Century, the Sciences became very important to all aspects of life. Of course, literature was one of those aspects. So through science and observation, they tried to investigate literature.

New Criticism: In the Early XX Century, they focused on the text only. The author, history, etc, had no importance at all when studying a piece of literature.

Reader Response: Also in the Early XX Century, some people thought about the reader of the text as the important aspect of studying literature. The personal experience of the reader had a substancial role in the text study.

Structuralism: Also in this same period, other thought arised. This separated the "signified" (idea) of the "signifier" (word).

Post-Structuralism: In the Mid XX Century, this idea borned. This proposed that we know what something is because we know it isn't another thing.

Marxism: This idea said that every single text had "subtexts" inside of it, that had a relation with ideological conflicts or social classes, problems that were quite discussed in those days.

Feminism: It put women as object of study. Women's experiences in literature.


Cultural Poetics: History as body of knowledge.

Postcolonial Criticism: Approach to texts produced in colonized countries. Ethnicity, Nationalism, and others are the bases of this study.

As you can see, through almost all History of men, we have investigated and studied Literature, because it's something almost as inherent to humans as language itself. For me, the Reader Response study is the most correct, because not everyone can see what you can see in a text. Comment with which of them you agree the most.

Joke about Feminism

Great Oral Presentation!

To test our learning process, we had to make an oral activity in which we demonstrated all our knowledge of Language. Particularly, in the group formed by José Tomás Gré, Thomas Reynolds and me, we made some sort of play about The Tower of Babel. It was quite funny and also in it, we discussed about different theories of how do we acquire language. The best thing of all, was that it was almost the only presentation that was performed, so it was different to the other ones. I enjoyed a lot with that kind of demonstration of all the achieved knowledge, as also I liked very much the debate activity we have done a pair of weeks before. I think oral presentations are the best way to  put in practise all the things learnt in class.

What is Literature?

From the V Century, men has being trying to answer the definition of literature. The Greeks started this process, but even nowadays, we don't have a clear denomination of the word. Some people think that literature is every single piece of written language, but others define it as something of pieces of "high culture", that means, Shakespeare's novels, poems, etc. 
In our Course Companion book, they define literature as "A highly developed use of language in that is the stylized manipulation of language for larger effect (purpose) and/or affect (emotional response)". So, from now and on, I'll use this definition of literature, that would include only highly developed pieces of written language and no magazines, cooking books, etc.